San Francisco - CA vs Indianapolis - IN: 2026 Housing Comparison

What this means for buyers

San Francisco - CA is roughly 284% more expensive than Indianapolis - IN in typical home value. Indianapolis - IN sees more listings with price cuts (35.8% vs 21.2%), a sign of softening seller expectations.

San Francisco vs Indianapolis: what the numbers say

At today's 7.24% average 30-year rate with 20% down, the typical home would cost about $6,108 a month in principal and interest in San Francisco and $1,590 in Indianapolis, a gap of $4,518 a month.

Typical rent runs $3,445 in San Francisco and $1,528 in Indianapolis, so the mortgage payment alone is 1.8 times rent in San Francisco and 1.0 times rent in Indianapolis, before taxes and insurance.

Home prices are 27.1 years of rent in San Francisco and 15.9 in Indianapolis; the lower ratio in Indianapolis means buying there is cheaper relative to renting.

Over the last 23 months typical values moved -0.6% in San Francisco and +2.7% in Indianapolis; over just the last three months the change was +1.4% in San Francisco and +0.1% in Indianapolis.

Homes sell for 106.1% of list price in San Francisco and 98.4% in Indianapolis, after 16 and 20 days on the market, with price cuts on 21% and 36% of listings. All three signs point the same way: buyers have more room to negotiate in Indianapolis.

The number of homes for sale is down 13% on a year ago in San Francisco and up 13% on a year ago in Indianapolis.

Payments assume a 30-year fixed loan at the Freddie Mac weekly average rate (2026-10-29), 20% down, principal and interest only. Home values, rents and market figures are Zillow Research metro data.