San Francisco - CA vs Riverside - CA: 2026 Housing Comparison
Side-by-side housing data for San Francisco - CA, CA and Riverside - CA, CA - typical home value, year-over-year change, median list price, days on market, and share of listings with a price cut. Refreshed from Zillow Research public CSVs.
What this means for buyers
San Francisco - CA is roughly 93% more expensive than Riverside - CA in typical home value. Homes sit on market longer in Riverside - CA (31 days vs 16), suggesting more buyer leverage there.
San Francisco vs Riverside: what the numbers say
At today's 7.32% average 30-year rate with 20% down, the typical home would cost about $6,157 a month in principal and interest in San Francisco and $3,189 in Riverside, a gap of $2,968 a month.
Typical rent runs $3,445 in San Francisco and $2,533 in Riverside, so the mortgage payment alone is 1.8 times rent in San Francisco and 1.3 times rent in Riverside, before taxes and insurance.
Home prices are 27.1 years of rent in San Francisco and 19.1 in Riverside; the lower ratio in Riverside means buying there is cheaper relative to renting.
Over the last 23 months typical values moved -0.6% in San Francisco and -1.9% in Riverside; over just the last three months the change was +1.4% in San Francisco and +0.1% in Riverside.
Homes sell for 106.1% of list price in San Francisco and 99.1% in Riverside, after 16 and 31 days on the market, with price cuts on 21% and 24% of listings. All three signs point the same way: buyers have more room to negotiate in Riverside.
The number of homes for sale is down 13% on a year ago in San Francisco and down 5% on a year ago in Riverside.
Payments assume a 30-year fixed loan at the Freddie Mac weekly average rate (2026-10-22), 20% down, principal and interest only. Home values, rents and market figures are Zillow Research metro data.
Other comparisons
Protect what you own.
Sponsored links. See our affiliate disclosure.