San Francisco - CA vs Austin - TX: 2026 Housing Comparison
Side-by-side housing data for San Francisco - CA, CA and Austin - TX, TX - typical home value, year-over-year change, median list price, days on market, and share of listings with a price cut. Refreshed from Zillow Research public CSVs.
What this means for buyers
San Francisco - CA is roughly 170% more expensive than Austin - TX in typical home value. Homes sit on market longer in Austin - TX (60 days vs 16), suggesting more buyer leverage there. Austin - TX sees more listings with price cuts (30.1% vs 21.2%), a sign of softening seller expectations.
San Francisco vs Austin: what the numbers say
At today's 7.24% average 30-year rate with 20% down, the typical home would cost about $6,108 a month in principal and interest in San Francisco and $2,259 in Austin, a gap of $3,850 a month.
Typical rent runs $3,445 in San Francisco and $1,603 in Austin, so the mortgage payment alone is 1.8 times rent in San Francisco and 1.4 times rent in Austin, before taxes and insurance.
Home prices are 27.1 years of rent in San Francisco and 21.5 in Austin; the lower ratio in Austin means buying there is cheaper relative to renting.
Over the last 23 months typical values moved -0.6% in San Francisco and -9.8% in Austin; over just the last three months the change was +1.4% in San Francisco and -0.1% in Austin.
Homes sell for 106.1% of list price in San Francisco and 97.3% in Austin, after 16 and 60 days on the market, with price cuts on 21% and 30% of listings. All three signs point the same way: buyers have more room to negotiate in Austin.
The number of homes for sale is down 13% on a year ago in San Francisco and down 3% on a year ago in Austin.
Payments assume a 30-year fixed loan at the Freddie Mac weekly average rate (2026-10-29), 20% down, principal and interest only. Home values, rents and market figures are Zillow Research metro data.
Other comparisons
Protect what you own.
Sponsored links. See our affiliate disclosure.